S. B. Abramova, N. L. Antonova. Regional Youth in Search of Civic Identity: Digital Participation and the Observer Model

UDК 303.425.2-053.81

doi: 10.15507/2413-1407.123.031.202302.393-410

Abstract

Introduction. At present, the tasks of forming civic identity actualize the issues of digital civic participation and understanding the specifics of online activism as a factor and indicator of youth civic identity. The purpose of the article is to build a typology of models of digital civic activism and analyze observational models as a mechanism for the manifestation of civic identity.

Materials and Methods. The study is based on the results of a survey of residents of the Sverdlovsk region aged 14–25 years (n = 1 150). The object includes students (schoolchildren, secondary vocational schools and higher educational institutions) and working youth. The use of correlation analysis and the calculation of power-law averages made it possible to determine the relationship between digital participation models and the manifestation of civic identity.

Results. A typology has been made based on the status of involvement, three categories have been constructed: observers, doers, digital passivists. Young people include an observer position in the forms of manifestation of civic digital activism. The group of “observers” inside is heterogeneous and can be differentiated by the intensity of the use of digital practices. It is determined that the discrepancy between self-identification as an observer and real practices of digital civic participation create internal contradictions in the formation of civic identity.

Discussion and Conclusion. The study made it possible to determine that young people’s identification of themselves as “citizen observer” is a convenient model for them, which allows them to overcome the contradictions of identity and performs a number of functions. The transformation of the position of an “observer” into an interested one and easily switching from an outside observer to an active participant and vice versa was recorded. The results can be used in the development of regional youth projects, the implementation of civil initiatives, in the work of youth public organizations.

Keywords: digital participation, civic identity, civic engagement, urban youth, digital activism, observer model

Conflict of interests. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding. The research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation and the Government of the Sverdlovsk Region No. 22-28-20265 (https://rscf.ru/project/22-28-20265/).

For citation: Abramova S.B., Antonova N.L. Regional Youth in Search of Civic Identity: Digital Participation and the Observer Model. Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2023;31(2):393–410. https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.123.031.202302.393-410

REFERENCES

1. Magranov A.S., Detochenko L.S. Civil Identity of Modern Students: Features and Factors of Transformation. Sociological Studies. 2018;(8):108–116. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250000766-5

2. Mossberger K., Tolbert C.J., McNeal R.S. Digital Citizenship: The Internet, Society, and Participation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2007. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7428.001.0001

3. Vodolazhskaya T. [Civil Identity]. Educational Policy. 2010;(5-6):140–142. (In Russ.) EDN: VZZOQD

4. Belyakova I.G. Formation of Civil Identity in Educational Environment of the Globalizing World. Culture and Arts Herald. 2017;(2):98–105. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: YTNWMJ

5. Nemkov P.A. The Formation of Students’ Civil Identity as Part of Russian Student Movement’s Activity. Social and Political Research. 2020;(4):121–134. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.20323/2658-428X-2020-4-9-121-134

6. Safin N.V. Teenager Civil Identity as a Pedagogical Problem. Vestnik of Orenburg State Pedagogical University. 2016;(2):274–281. Available at: http://www.vestospu.ru/archive/2016/articles/Safin2-18.html (accessed 09.01.2023). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

7. Khoronko L., Tskvitariya T., Akhanov I. Cadets’ Axiological Basics of Formation of Civil Identity. Innovative Technologies in Science and Education. 2020;210. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021019006

8. Pan S. Identity, Civic Engagement, and Learning about Citizenship: University Students’ Experiences in Hong Kong. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. 2019;51(4):945–964. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1687286

9. Kaminchenko D.K. Reflection of the Networkization of Identity in the Political Process: The Example of the “Yellow Vests” Movement in France. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science. 2020;14(3):96–106. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2020-3-96-106

10. Tufekci Z. “Not This One”: Social Movements, the Attention Economy, and Microcelebrity Networked Activism. American Behavioral Scientist. 2013;57(7):848–870. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479369

11. Bryukhanov A.A. Digital Activism: Forms and Theoretical Approaches. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science. 2022;15(4):121–130. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2021-4-121-130

12. Treré E. Hybrid Media Activism: Ecologies, Imaginaries, Algorithms. London: Routledge; 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315438177

13. Akhremenko A.S., Stukal D.K., Petrov A.P. Network vs Message in Protest Diffusion on Social Media: Theoretical and Data Analytics Perspectives. Polis. Political Studies. 2020;(2):73–91. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.02.06

14. Ermolaeva P., Ermolaeva Y., Basheva O. Digital Environmental Activism as the New Form of Environmental Participation. The Russian Sociological Review. 2020;19(3):376–408. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2020-3-376-408

15. Brodovskaya Ye.V., Dombrovskaya A.Yu., Pyrma R.V., Azarov A.A. Civil and Political Online Practices in the Evaluations of Russian Youth. Political Science. 2019;(2):180–197. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/grazhdanskie-i-politicheskie-onlai-n-praktiki-v-otsenkah-rossii-skoi-molodezhi-2018 (accessed 09.01.2023). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

16. Basheva O.A. Digital Activism as a New Method of Civil Mobilization. Research Result. Sociology and Management. 2020;6(1):41–57. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-9338-2020-6-1-0-4

17. Gerbaudo P. From Cyber-Autonomism to Cyber-Populism: An Ideological History of Digital Activism. TripleC. 2017;15(2):477–489. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v15i2.773

18. Vasilyeva E.I., Zerchaninova T.E., Nikitina A.S. Research of Modern Social and Political Alternative Forms of Youth Civic Engagement. Bulletin of Surgut State Pedagogical University. 2020;(5):56–64. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.26105/SSPU.2020.68.5.005

19. Dombrovskaya A.Yu., Sinyakov A.V. Opposition Potential of Russians’ Civil Participation: Results of the Cluster Analysis. Political Science. 2021;(3):142–160. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://www.doi.org/10.31249/poln/2021.03.06

20. Antonova N.L. Abramova S.B., Gurarii A.D. Classification of Non-Political Participation Practices of Urban Youth: Forms, Motivation, Barriers. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2022;15(1):243–257. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://www.doi.org/10.15838/esc.2022.1.79.13

21. Vorobеv V.P., Ivchenkov S.G., Eremina E.V., Retinskaya V.N., Murzina I.A. Formation of the Social Identity of the Youth of the Region: The Potential of Aesthetic Information. Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2022;30(2):470‒491. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.119.030.202202.470-491

22. Drobizheva L.M. The Meanings of All-Russian Civic Identity in Russian Mass Consciousness. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal. 2020;(4):480–498. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.4.1261

23. Volodenkov S.V., Fedorchenko S.N. Digital Infrastructures of Civic and Political Activism: Current Challenges, Risks and Constraints. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal. 2021;(6):97–118. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.6.2014

24. Parma R.V. Public Activism of Russian Citizens in Offline and Online Spaces. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2021;(6):145–170. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.6.2042

25. Gudoshnikova O.E. Technologies of “New Media” as a Platform for Civic Engagement. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2015;(1-1). Available at: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=18442 (accessed 21.11.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

Submitted 24.11.2022; revised 01.02.2023; accepted 10.02.2023.

About the authors:

Sofya B. Abramova, Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Associate Professor, Department of Applied Sociology, Ural Institute for the Humanities, Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin (19 Mir St., Yekaterinburg 620083, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4010-8406, s.b.abramova@urfu.ru

Natalya L. Antonova, Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Professor, Department of Applied Sociology, Ural Institute for the Humanities, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin (19 Mir St., Yekaterinburg 620083, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2063-4970, n.l.antonova@urfu.ru

Contribution of the authors:

S. B. Abramova – research methods; conducting research; data processing; research results analysis and interpretation.

N. L. Antonova – concept of the article; theoretical content of the article; research results analysis and interpretation.

The authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.